WORKPLACE DYNAMICS AND THEIR EFFECT ON JOB SATISFACTION AND STRESS AMONG IT EMPLOYEES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62737/v91eza19Keywords:
Workplace Environment, Job Satisfaction, Stress Levels, Organizational CultureAbstract
This study explores the impact of the workplace environment on job satisfaction and stress levels among employees in India’s Information Technology (IT) sector. By thoroughly monitoring factors such as organizational culture, leadership styles, job design, and demographic variables, the study seeks to find the key elements that affect workers well-being and organizational performance. The study highlights significant connections between workplace environment characteristics and employee outcomes. Organizational culture is identified as a crucial factor, with supportive and positive cultures linked to higher job satisfaction and lower stress levels. Leadership practices and job design also play a crucial role in shaping employee experiences, with effective leadership and thoughtfully designed roles contributing to increased job satisfaction and reduced stress. Furthermore, the study observed gender-based differences in job satisfaction and stress levels, underscoring the need for gender-sensitive approaches in organizational policies and initiatives. Also, the study highlights the significance of organizations prioritizing employee well-being and mental health by promoting work-life balance, effective stress management, and supportive workplace practices. The results suggest that IT companies in India can benefit from introducing initiatives aimed at improving job satisfaction and alleviating employee stress. By cultivating a positive workplace culture, offering resources to help employees handle job demands, and promoting diversity and inclusion, organizations can create healthier, more inclusive, and productive environments.
References
[1] Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full range leadership development: Basic and advanced manuals. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio & Associates.
[2] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art.Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
[3] Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
[4] Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2003). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.75
[5] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction publishers.
[6] Clark, L., & Zinger, T. J. (2018). Workplace environment and job satisfaction in the IT industry: A review of the literature. Information Technology & People, 31(4), 1116- 1145.
[7] Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047327
[8] Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
[9] Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
[10] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.44.3.513
[11] American psychologist, 44(3), 513.
[12] Johnson, J. V., & Hall, E. M. (1988). Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American journal of public health, 78(10), 1336-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.10.1336
[13] Karasek's Job Demand-Control Model: Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative science quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
[14] Kossek, E. E., & Lambert, S. J. (2005). Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[15] Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
[16] Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
[17] Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management journal, 44(6), 1102-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069391
[18] Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of occupational health psychology, 1(1), 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27
[19] Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
